Physical Activity and Breast Cancer
Thune et al (1997) found in their study of over 25,000 participants that an increased amount of physical activity during leisure time and work is associated with a decreased risk of breast cancer. The study evaluated the influence of physical activity, both at work and leisure time, in a large sample (n =25, 624, age 20 to 54) of pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women. Further support to the notion of increased physical activity and lower incidence of breast cancer is supported in studies of former college athletes10,11 and general population (Friedenreich et.al.,1995). One hypothesis for the lower incidence of breast cancer in former athletes relates to the later age of menarche usually found in this population (Frisch et al. 1985). Both early menarche and late menopause would be expected because they (the athletic population) would generally carry less body fat.
However, there are a number of studies that have found no evidence to suggest physical activity can help to reduce the incidence of breast cancer in a population. One such study looked at a large sample (n = 10118) of female teachers in Finland (Pukkala, et.al.,1993) and compared the incidence of cancers in a group of physically active teachers (PE teachers) with a less active group (language teachers). Another study showed that the risk for male and female breast cancer became elevated after socio-economic status was taken into consideration (Dosemeci et al 1993). A suggestion may be that lower socio-economic groups may not have sufficient physical activity and consume a “less healthy” diet (i.e., with higher fat intake), thus potentially increasing the risk of cancer. This article on the BBC website provides an interesting discussion on possible lifestyle links to breast cancer: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1633831.stm .
A review by Van Gaal and Mertens, cited in
Kopelman and Stock (1998), shows conflicting evidence in relation to breast
cancer and fat distribution. Some studies have reported a correlation between
breast cancer risk and fat distribution (Van Gaal et al. (1998). Other studies
have not come to the same conclusions.
The connection between physical activity and body fat distribution is that physical activity can help control body weight.
Physical Activity and Colon Cancer
Much of the research conducted on cancer and physical activity combine the data for colon and rectal cancers. Friendreich and Orenstein (2002) state that the evidence for a link between physical inactivity and the appearance of colon cancer is strong and consistent. Giovanucci et al (1995) found that physical activity was inversely related with colon cancer, after adjustments for age and other factors.
Waist to hip ratio and waist circumference were also indicative of risk factors for colon cancer. Therefore, it could be hypothesized that increased abdominal adiposity is associated with an elevated risk. This can be viewed as a significant finding as the study examined a large group of participants (n = 51529). However, because the sample group consisted of health professionals, it is could be argued that this is not representative of the general population. Dosemeci et al. (1993) suggested that the lower the socio-economic status, the higher the incidence of colon cancer. Additionally cancers of the colon and prostate showed an increased risk with males participating in lower levels of activity. Slattery et al. (1997) lend support to the notion that low levels of physical activity and high energy intake (therefore, a potential increase in body mass) are associated with colon cancer. The same study found that a high level of energy intake that was balanced by a high level of physical revealed a non-significant risk of colon cancer.
Another study (Paffenbarger et al. 1987) highlighted varying populations, (i.e., dockworkers, college alumni etc.) and reviewed them for the incidence of cancer in relation to the levels of physical activity involved during both leisure time and occupational time. The conclusions suggested that the more active men have an increased likelihood to die from pancreatic and colorectal cancers. No differences by activity for the incident of prostate cancer were noted. However, Friedenreich (2001) suggests that the evidence for correlation between physical activity and colon/colorectal cancer is convincing. A significant number of studies have clearly demonstrated a large reduction in risk of cancer in the physically active. (Thun et al. 1992: Paffenbarger et al. 1987: Lee et al.1994)Batty and Thune (2000) suggest plausible mechanisms of protection of physical activity on insulin amongst others, which positively influence cells in the colon. Additionally, they suggest that physical activity improves the transit time of the bowel, thus reducing the contact time with carcinogens in faecal matter. The authors report the appearance of an increased risk of colon cancer associated with sedentary or light physical activity. This supports the statement that increased physical activity appears to aid in the reduction of risk for colon and rectal cancers.
Other Cancer Sites
An examination of data from the National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey (NHAMES 1) by Albanes et al. (1989) showed a
nearly two-fold risk increase in the inactive group for all cancer sites. The
study used 5,138 men and 7,407 females, age 25 to 74 years of age. The most
common sites of cancer identified in the follow up period of the study for
males were lung, prostate and colorectal. The common sites in females were
identified as breast and colorectal.
Exercise has an important role in cancer prevention by helping to maintain a healthy body weight especially when combined with a healthy diet. It may also have a more direct effect on cancer risk. Exercise is thought to influence the levels of hormones such as estrogen and insulin in the body and may have a particular effect in hormone-related cancers.
There is also evidence that physical activity significantly reduces the risk of bowel cancer and may help lower the risk of breast, prostate, lung and endometrial cancer. Cancer Research UK suggests moderate exercise five days per week for around thirty minutes.
The protective mechanism suggested by Thune and Furberg (2001) is that physical activity improves ventilation and perfusion. Therefore, concentration of carcinogenic agents in the airways will be reduced as will the duration of agent/airway interaction. Albanes et al. (1989) supports a protective effect from leisure time activity and is supported by Lee et al. (1999) and Severson et al (1989). Due to the relatively small number of supportive studies on lung cancer and physical activity, the current results must be treated with caution, particularly when considering the participants of the studies. The majority of participants in this area have been male, so perhaps more females need to be recruited to establish a male/female risk factor. There is little mention of the ethnicity of the participants.
Exercise prescription as part of the disease management for cancer patients must be highly individualized because of the extreme variability of the effects of cancer and treatment regimens on functional capacity. Furthermore, other concurrent or prior health problems should be anticipated and taken into account in developing any exercise prescription. Although it is acknowledged that the recommendations for exercise should be modified for specific patients, it is generally accepted to recommend 30 minutes of continuous exercise such as brisk walking or swimming three to four times per week. Attention should be given to safety measures and general health maintenance. These guidelines are the general exercise recommendations outlined by American College of Sports Medicine (2006) and more recently updated (Haskell, et al. 2007). Furthermore, Cancer UK published a good healthy living leaflet for general health ( http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/healthyliving/tentoptips/ ).Walking and cycling are recommended as safe and generally well tolerated exercise modes involving large muscle groups. De-conditioned patients should begin with daily sessions of shorter duration and lower intensity. In general, moderate intensity exercise (50-75% HR reserve, RPE 11-14) sessions of between 20 and 30 minutes duration are recommended, with modifications as needed, including an interval approach to cardiovascular exercise, consisting of short exercise bouts (three to five minutes) followed by rest periods.
While there is a link between physical activity and certain cancers, there still seems to be a gap in the knowledge of why physical activity seems to have a preventative effect on certain cancers. Some studies offer suggestions, but there is no clear reason of the “why” increased physical activity may help and “how” it may help.
There is not sufficient conclusive evidence to say that an increased physical activity level has a preventative measure against the development of all site cancers. However, as discussed above, there is strong evidence for the decreased risk of certain cancers.Practically speaking it is difficult to make general recommendations regarding frequency, intensity, and duration. No one individual or demographic will be the same. The key is to remember this and use gradual progressive exercise programming.
The weekend is the time when we all get relaxed, and maybe a little too relaxed with our diets, but it's important to realize that you can still enjoy yourself and keep on track by making a few slight adjustments.
During the week, it is much easier to maintain a healthier lifestyle because you slip into a routine that you get used to and many of us are on autopilot – gym, work, eat, sleep, repeat; but the weekend is a different animal altogether.
The problem is that on the weekend, the textbook simply goes out the window. It’s the weekend!
You’ve been waiting all week to cheat, but what you need to realize is that you’re doing more harm than good.
Being proactive about your health and making every day count means that you need to iron out all of the creases, and when it comes to your diet and training that normally means prioritizing the weekend and stopping yourself from bingeing.
Strength training comes in all shapes and sizes, and if you incorporate slight adjustments to your gym routine you’ll find that it’ll be both rewarding and beneficial.
If you have plateaued and you're not seeing results any more; this will lead you to frustration and in the end you will start having negative results and thoughts.
But it doesn’t have to be that way…
Strength training comes in all shapes and sizes, and if you have slight adjustments to your gym workouts you’ll find that
it’ll be both rewarding and beneficial. We have listed 7 different ways
in which you can alter your training workout to suit your needs and the needs of
your body, which will help you adapt and in turn you will start to see gains in your training.
What if we told you that top athletes suffer from the same thing as you do? Inflammation happens to everyone; it is part of our body’s natural response to training and damaged tissues and also plays a role in the immune system response. With modern day advances in sport science we are now able to see just how much inflammation you’re likely to feel from a strenuous bout of activity through the analysis of your genes.
A DNA Kit test will look at four genetic inflammatory markers - IL6, IL6R, CRP and TNF. Variations in these genes give us a clue if you are predisposed to suffer significantly higher levels or slightly lower levels of inflammation. Knowing your predisposition of this biological phenomenon can make big alteration to your training and even more so to your recovery strategies which dictate your training schedule and ultimately your goals.
Acute inflammation is important for healing; however excessive inflammation can result in prolonged feelings of soreness, tenderness, swelling, and also in a loss of function (reduces ROM or range of motion) and could even result in allergies and chronic diseases. There are various strategies that can be used to help decrease acute and chronic inflammation like sports massage therapy , but for the purpose of today's blog we will be looking at foods that can help in the role of decreasing inflammation in our body:
For those people who know me will tell you I am the most skeptical person out there when it comes to new products and fad diets to aid fitness training and weight management. I go to lots of trade fairs and seminars and see lots of new products, most of the time I have made my mind up within 20 seconds. Science has to prove it works for me to believe in something, it’s the way I run my business as a sports therapist and the way I train myself.
I first saw the DNA fitness tests in 2013 at a trade show; it was not something I was interested in at the time so I walked on by. However, after seeing these tests repeatedly pop up on trade and fitness magazines I started to take more of an interest.
Over the years I’ve personally battled with injuries from playing sport and had to deal with my own weight issues while being off sport recovering from injury. It’s what got me in to my now profession as a sports therapist; I help many athletes recover, prepare and condition their bodies ready for their events.
As a sports person you are always looking for that extra legal edge, that extra bit that will gain you a few seconds off your personal best or just be able to train and diet better for a healthier lifestyle. So I felt that taking the DNA Diet Fitness Pro test was really worthwhile.
The reports included an abundance of manageable and easily understandable information about my DNA and also provided focused and implementable advice, which wasn’t just based on eating less and exercising more. I was particularly impressed with the strength of the connections DNAFit made between my genetics and the practical implications the results might have in terms of my diet and fitness.
I would recommend this test to anyone interested in improving their health and fitness, regardless of whether you’re a complete beginner or training for a marathon.
There has been a huge increase in interest in cycling over recent years as more people become aware of the health and fitness benefits’ cycling achieves, as well as its advantages as a fast and economical means of transport. Studio cycling has also grown and has been identified as one of the most popular group exercise formats in clubs worldwide.
Good bacteria can help you lose weight
For every probiotic evangelist there are several that sneered at the idea that these ‘good bacteria’ products did anything other than leave a big whole in your pocket. But according to a recent study, probiotics are very much more than a health food gimmick.
Probiotics, which are available as yoghurts, drinks and pills, contain so called ‘good’ bacteria that manufacturers claim aid digestive health and boost the immune system.
But the jury remained out – until now when a study has found that they do have many health benefits, including proving effective medicines and helping to control weight.
But you need to need to use the probiotics every day to see any benefits and you should be mindful of the sugar content (it’s best to opt for a pill over yoghurt) which will negate any of the benefits.
The definition of motivation is that which gives the impetus to behaviour by arousing, sustaining and directing it towards the successful attainment of goals. Abraham Maslow (1954) proposed that we all have a hierarchy of needs, the most basic being physiological needs such as food, and the highest needs being those related to self-fulfillment. Motivation directs behaviour – it organizes behaviour towards a particular goal state. It maintains behaviour until that goal is achieved.
The marathon is a long-distance running event with an official distance of 26 miles and 385 yards that is usually run as a road race. The marathon was one of the original modern Olympic events in 1896, though the distance did not become standardized until 1921. More than 500 marathons are contested throughout the world each year, with the vast majority of competitors being recreational athletes. Larger marathons can have tens of thousands of participants.
Although, all of the information that is presented in this article is geared toward the benefits and/or effectiveness of anaerobic high intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. low intensity aerobic training with regards to fat utilization, there is an understanding that some reasons for aerobic training supersede the outcomes. For the sake of pure enjoyment, personal goal setting (training for a triathlon, marathon, road race, etc), and the challenge of competition are all viable and respectable reasons for interacting with long slow distance (LSD) activities. For many people these types of activities are suitable for their lifestyle and enjoyable means of living an active life. The goal of this article is not to discount or diminish the value of physical activity in all its modalities, but to merely present data with regards to optimum fat loss, hormonal indicators, and other factors of cardiovascular and cardio respiratory markers as they pertain to exercise intensity prescription.